From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL training recommendations? |
Date: | 2012-10-17 15:05:56 |
Message-ID: | CAOR=d=2+3yyzgUSig8ZgXC3fHsGEPaV7tHFdqMprT3Rhj7RdoA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Vincent Veyron <vv(dot)lists(at)wanadoo(dot)fr> wrote:
>>
>> I am surprised none of the fine contributors to this thread mentionned
>> an activity they practice extensively, which is reading this list's
>> content every day.
>>
>> Best training material ever in my opinion.
>
> A pay-for magazine you can probably claim on your taxes as a necessary
> expense. Is it possible somehow to claim that reading this list is
> vital to your work, and therefore the 5 hours a week you spend
> answering other threads (in order to repay the community) is a
> legitimate work expense? :)
I've been on more than one job interview where the guy interviewing me
is someone who's question I've answered in the past here.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Will Rutherdale (rutherw) | 2012-10-17 15:22:03 | Re: Does Postgres Object-Relational Syntax follow Standard? |
Previous Message | David Johnston | 2012-10-17 15:01:55 | Re: problem with distinct not distincting... |