Re: Does Postgres Object-Relational Syntax follow Standard?

From: "Will Rutherdale (rutherw)" <rutherw(at)cisco(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Does Postgres Object-Relational Syntax follow Standard?
Date: 2012-10-17 15:22:03
Message-ID: B90F43429775DA4E80ECABFB9E6BDC26159769FF@xmb-aln-x10.cisco.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig Ringer [mailto:ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au]
> Sent: 16 October 2012 21:27
> To: Will Rutherdale (rutherw)
> Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Does Postgres Object-Relational Syntax follow
> Standard?
>
> On 10/17/2012 05:00 AM, Will Rutherdale (rutherw) wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I was having a discussion with people at work about the Postgres object-
> relational syntax.
>
> What syntax specifically? Do you mean table inheritance and SELECT ONLY ?

Just the basic Postgres Object notation, such as CREATE TABLE ... INHERITS, along with related syntax one might use with it. The ONLY keyword would be part of that.

People looking at Postgres might reasonably ask, what does its Object support do, and does it follow a standard.

-Will

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Will Rutherdale (rutherw) 2012-10-17 15:25:27 Re: Does Postgres Object-Relational Syntax follow Standard?
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2012-10-17 15:05:56 Re: PostgreSQL training recommendations?