Re: Data replication to PostgreSQL

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ram DBA <postgresdbas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Data replication to PostgreSQL
Date: 2016-12-29 15:26:27
Message-ID: CAOR=d=0AQj=9Ua=CniKFdey0MLxbkSv8CeYTfQwiiqOB5UqUSw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:12 AM, John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand what you're doing. Nearly all DDL is written to
> the WAL segments. The only ones that aren't are things like unlogged and
> temporary tables. I don't think temporary tables used by queries are written
> either. Why do you think, however, that this isn't captured?

Maybe OP is thinking about Slony replication?

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Scalia 2016-12-29 15:50:30 Re: Data replication to PostgreSQL
Previous Message John Scalia 2016-12-29 15:12:35 Re: Data replication to PostgreSQL