From: | John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ram DBA <postgresdbas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Data replication to PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2016-12-29 15:12:35 |
Message-ID: | CABzCKRC-_DCv72+gvOAsH8-25cD=WrxOKdy7yz+RHcy+-p-ohA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
I'm not sure I understand what you're doing. Nearly all DDL is written to
the WAL segments. The only ones that aren't are things like unlogged and
temporary tables. I don't think temporary tables used by queries are
written either. Why do you think, however, that this isn't captured?
--
Jay
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Ram DBA <postgresdbas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> We have an use case to copy the data from Salesforce to PostgreSQL
> environment but because of DDL changes that can happen to tables from
> Salesforce application side, replication would eventually fail. Do we have
> any open source tools that can also capture the DDL changes and replicate
> to PostgreSQL?
>
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Ram
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2016-12-29 15:26:27 | Re: Data replication to PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Ram DBA | 2016-12-29 14:35:20 | Data replication to PostgreSQL |