"Re: Question about grant create on database and pg_dump/pg_dumpall"

From: Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com, david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com, MURPHYKE(at)email(dot)chop(dot)edu, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: "Re: Question about grant create on database and pg_dump/pg_dumpall"
Date: 2016-09-23 11:54:32
Message-ID: CAOGQiiPbaBCmB5ABqLr+gXvQWR6DmerJ8gPVSKCA_izMZXYchg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 06:39 AM, Haribabu Kommi
kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:

Still i feel the GRANT statements should be present, as the create
database statement
is generated only with -C option. So attached patch produces the GRANT
statements based
on the -x option.

The attached patch does the job fine. However, I am a little skeptical
about this addition, since, it is clearly mentioned in the documentation of
pg_dump that it would not restore global objects, then why expecting this.
Adding this makes pg_dump -C somewhat special as now it is restoring these
grant statements. Only if we consider the popular method of dump-restore
mentioned in the thread (https://www.postgresql.org/
message-id/E1VYMqi-0001P4-P4%40wrigleys.postgresql.org) with pg_dumpall -g
and then individual pg_dump, then it would be helpful to have this patch.

Regards,
Rafia Sabih
EnterpriseDB:: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rakesh Kumar 2016-09-23 12:01:49 Multiple inserts
Previous Message Rafia Sabih 2016-09-23 08:13:38 Re: Question about "grant create on database" and pg_dump/pg_dumpall