From: | Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com, MURPHYKE(at)email(dot)chop(dot)edu, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Question about "grant create on database" and pg_dump/pg_dumpall |
Date: | 2016-09-23 08:13:38 |
Message-ID: | CAOGQiiOgSi4Z-iPUctvTicdj7LXzFE-uaQ7eaGdy0caOE9CQNg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 06:39 AM, Haribabu Kommi
kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
Still i feel the GRANT statements should be present, as the create
database statement
is generated only with -C option. So attached patch produces the GRANT
statements based
on the -x option.
The attached patch does the job fine. However, I am a little skeptical
about this addition, since, it is clearly mentioned in the documentation of
pg_dump that it would not restore global objects, then why expecting this.
Adding this makes pg_dump -C somewhat special as now it is restoring these
grant statements. Only if we consider the popular method of dump-restore
mentioned in the thread (
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1VYMqi-0001P4-P4%40wrigleys.postgresql.org)
with pg_dumpall -g and then individual pg_dump, then it would be helpful to
have this patch.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rafia Sabih | 2016-09-23 11:54:32 | "Re: Question about grant create on database and pg_dump/pg_dumpall" |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-22 16:41:21 | Re: Unstable C Function |