Re: Performance benchmark of PG

From: Ninad Shah <nshah(dot)postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Manish Lad <manishlad7893(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance benchmark of PG
Date: 2021-07-19 16:48:24
Message-ID: CAOFEiBdGE4cFjfdaxVJ0yZbmTp_5kVr2dhu79Ve1p_2f93_wvQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

As Thomas rightly pointed about the feasibility of benchmarking. You may
still compare performance of queries on both Exadata as well as PostgreSQL.
IMO, it may not be on par, but it must be acceptable.

In the contemporary world, 60TB isn't really a huge database. So, I hardly
think you should find any performance issues on PostgreSQL.

All the best.

Regards,
Ninad Shah

On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 16:54, Manish Lad <manishlad7893(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Thank you all for your swift response.
>
> Thank you again.
>
> Manish
>
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, 15:39 Manish Lad, <manishlad7893(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>>
>> We are planning to migrate Oracle exadata database to postgresql and db
>> size ranges from 1 tb to 60 TB.
>>
>> Will the PG support this with the performance matching to that of exadata
>> applince?
>> If anyone could point me in the right direction where i xan get the
>> benchmarking done for these two databases either on prime or any cloud
>> would be great.
>>
>> Thanks all in advance.
>>
>> Manish
>>
>>>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manish Lad 2021-07-20 07:56:58 Re: Performance benchmark of PG
Previous Message Manish Lad 2021-07-19 11:23:39 Re: Performance benchmark of PG