From: | Manish Lad <manishlad7893(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ninad Shah <nshah(dot)postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Performance benchmark of PG |
Date: | 2021-07-20 07:56:58 |
Message-ID: | CADPrz78h7KR2wM=xuQk0NN2mZ8nZ1aiSAos96M+WLeEzc-Pg7g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Thanks a lot.
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, 22:18 Ninad Shah, <nshah(dot)postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> As Thomas rightly pointed about the feasibility of benchmarking. You may
> still compare performance of queries on both Exadata as well as PostgreSQL.
> IMO, it may not be on par, but it must be acceptable.
>
> In the contemporary world, 60TB isn't really a huge database. So, I hardly
> think you should find any performance issues on PostgreSQL.
>
> All the best.
>
>
> Regards,
> Ninad Shah
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 16:54, Manish Lad <manishlad7893(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you all for your swift response.
>>
>> Thank you again.
>>
>> Manish
>>
>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, 15:39 Manish Lad, <manishlad7893(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>> We are planning to migrate Oracle exadata database to postgresql and db
>>> size ranges from 1 tb to 60 TB.
>>>
>>> Will the PG support this with the performance matching to that of
>>> exadata applince?
>>> If anyone could point me in the right direction where i xan get the
>>> benchmarking done for these two databases either on prime or any cloud
>>> would be great.
>>>
>>> Thanks all in advance.
>>>
>>> Manish
>>>
>>>>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dirschel, Steve | 2021-07-21 17:13:05 | Query Performance |
Previous Message | Ninad Shah | 2021-07-19 16:48:24 | Re: Performance benchmark of PG |