| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 64-bit queryId? |
| Date: | 2017-10-20 14:07:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAOBaU_a70Y=i7A9ctKRnxYsEfYtVOgA1GZPe+ZnqbZgG1FMe9A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I agree, and I'm perfectly fine with adding a comment around pgssHashKey.
>>
>> PFA a patch to warn about the danger.
>
> Committed a somewhat different version of this - hope you are OK with
> the result.
That's much better than what I proposed. Thanks a lot!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-10-20 14:19:05 | Re: What is the point of setrefs.c's is_converted_whole_row_reference? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-10-20 13:49:13 | Re: BUG #14849: jsonb_build_object doesn't like VARIADIC calls very much |