Re: WAL usage calculation patch

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Kirill Bychik <kirill(dot)bychik(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Date: 2020-04-30 07:18:57
Message-ID: CAOBaU_Y9WFksFofFAG9fw214sqb_jTTAues5e30UiTOqXMaTFA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 5:05 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 7:38 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 1:22 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > I agree with that definition. I can send a cleanup patch if there's
> > > no objection.
> > >
> >
> > Okay, feel free to send the patch. Thanks for taking the initiative
> > to write a patch for this.
> >
>
> Julien, are you planning to write a cleanup patch for this open item?

Sorry Amit, I've been quite busy at work for the last couple of days.
I'll take care of that this morning for sure!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2020-04-30 07:20:18 Re: Fixes for two separate bugs in nbtree VACUUM's page deletion
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-04-30 07:00:49 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions