Re: WAL usage calculation patch

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Kirill Bychik <kirill(dot)bychik(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Date: 2020-04-30 03:05:13
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KaiLVwJZyqZ0pbcOZLnyM5wV+rxK-JPMjb6WjgYECyZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 7:38 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 1:22 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
>
> > I agree with that definition. I can send a cleanup patch if there's
> > no objection.
> >
>
> Okay, feel free to send the patch. Thanks for taking the initiative
> to write a patch for this.
>

Julien, are you planning to write a cleanup patch for this open item?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-04-30 03:06:55 Re: PG compilation error with Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2020-04-30 02:45:16 Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?