From: | Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix parallel vacuum buffer usage reporting |
Date: | 2024-05-03 06:41:42 |
Message-ID: | CAO6_XqpmPq1W9mG1nygKmmXHj-4_kf0zjSsoir0hsM81uNtc2A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 5:37 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Thank you for further testing! I've pushed the patch.
Thanks!
Here is the rebased version for the follow-up patch removing VacuumPage
variables. Though I'm not sure if I should create a dedicated mail thread
since the bug was fixed and the follow-up is more of a refactoring. What
do you think?
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v1-0001-Use-pgBufferUsage-for-block-reporting-in-analyze.patch | application/octet-stream | 6.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2024-05-03 06:47:20 | Re: Document NULL |
Previous Message | Hans Buschmann | 2024-05-03 06:22:34 | AW: Proposal: Early providing of PGDG repositories for the major Linux distributions like Fedora or Debian |