| From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fix parallel vacuum buffer usage reporting |
| Date: | 2024-05-08 13:46:52 |
| Message-ID: | CAD21AoB1oL4paRWNQTufi2T4wN0btLxqdkYNkfGnGKo-HSkUAQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 3:41 PM Anthonin Bonnefoy
<anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 5:37 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for further testing! I've pushed the patch.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Here is the rebased version for the follow-up patch removing VacuumPage variables. Though I'm not sure if I should create a dedicated mail thread since the bug was fixed and the follow-up is more of a refactoring. What do you think?
I'd suggest starting a new thread or changing the subject as the
current subject no longer matches what we're discussing.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-05-08 13:51:28 | Re: SQL:2011 application time |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-05-08 13:44:12 | Re: AIX support |