| From: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG 14 pg_basebackup accepts --compress=server-zst option |
| Date: | 2024-06-07 12:04:33 |
| Message-ID: | CANzqJaAAJmAhgbYYx1T-+-A_myAEOLgDbzE3m5zfOQMwNzcCQQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 12:32 AM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thursday, June 6, 2024, Kashif Zeeshan <kashi(dot)zeeshan(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 6:54 AM Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/app-pgbasebackup.html doesn't
>>> mention "--compress=[{client|server}-]method". That first appears in the
>>> v15 docs.
>>>
>>> And yet pg_basebackup doesn't complain about an invalid option.
>>> (Technically, this is a bug; I first noticed it a week after copying a
>>> script from a PG 15 server to five PG 14 servers, and running it quite a
>>> few times without fail.)
>>>
>>
> Seems a bit suspect, but as your script doesn’t mention tar the option
> itself is apparently ignored, I guess silently.
>
Does this mean that "--compress=server-zst" is only relevant with
--format=tar?
> Assuming this isn’t an actual regression in behavior in a patch-released
> older version
>
My apologies for not mentioning the version: 14.12-1PGDG-rhel8.
> I don’t see us adding an error message at this point.
>
Me neither. It just seemed odd.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2024-06-07 12:13:55 | Re: Poor performance after restoring database from snapshot on AWS RDS |
| Previous Message | Zwettler Markus (OIZ) | 2024-06-07 11:04:08 | PG16.1 security breach? |