From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kashif Zeeshan <kashi(dot)zeeshan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG 14 pg_basebackup accepts --compress=server-zst option |
Date: | 2024-06-07 04:32:09 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYhAbOwvMfCSWg4VMAWDUX1kCZAdG1XQMKnWWFZYyOpTA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thursday, June 6, 2024, Kashif Zeeshan <kashi(dot)zeeshan(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 6:54 AM Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/app-pgbasebackup.html doesn't mention
>> "--compress=[{client|server}-]method". That first appears in the v15
>> docs.
>>
>> And yet pg_basebackup doesn't complain about an invalid option.
>> (Technically, this is a bug; I first noticed it a week after copying a
>> script from a PG 15 server to five PG 14 servers, and running it quite a
>> few times without fail.)
>>
>
Seems a bit suspect, but as your script doesn’t mention tar the option
itself is apparently ignored, I guess silently. Assuming this isn’t an
actual regression in behavior in a patch-released older version I don’t see
us adding an error message at this point.
> If the support is removed then it should be mentioned in the official
> documentation.
>
Support wasn’t removed. Re-read the email and check the version/times
being mentioned again.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Muhammad Ikram | 2024-06-07 05:40:38 | Re: Oracle to Postgres - Transform Hash Partition |
Previous Message | Kashif Zeeshan | 2024-06-07 04:27:07 | Re: PG 14 pg_basebackup accepts --compress=server-zst option |