Re: [pgAdmin][RM5569] [SQL] Bad display of tables storage parameters in the "SQL" tab (correction of bug #5398 not complete)

From: Akshay Joshi <akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Rahul Shirsat <rahul(dot)shirsat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Khushboo Vashi <khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgAdmin][RM5569] [SQL] Bad display of tables storage parameters in the "SQL" tab (correction of bug #5398 not complete)
Date: 2020-07-11 15:10:26
Message-ID: CANxoLDeBaVz3aWKCvBf96XEzQV6aF5VmZpsNcmpOkdo++t6YSA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi Rahul

Reverting the patch.

Have you run the RESQL test cases for all the PG/EPAS server? Jenkin's
build failed on PG 11 and RESQL test cases are not implemented for EPAS at
all.
@Rahul Shirsat <rahul(dot)shirsat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> please make sure before
sending the patch.
@Khushboo Vashi <khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> please run as a part of
the review process.

Fixes needed:

- Rename the folder "partitions/tests/pg/11_plus" to
"partitions/tests/pg/12_plus" as OID and default tablespace not available
from PG/EPAS 12.
- Remove extra space from table/sql/11_plus/create.sql to fix RESQL test
cases.
- On EPAS server facing "autovacuum_enabled" key error when we create a
Partitioned Table and click on the SQL tab.
- Make sure if you change any SQL file similar changes need to be done
for EPAS and other version-specific folder.

On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 5:01 PM Akshay Joshi <akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:

> Thanks, patch applied.
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 6:16 PM Khushboo Vashi <
> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have fixed the issue and also reviewed the patch.
>> It looks good to me apart from the written RE-SQL test cases that don't
>> test the SQL storage params (which will be added with the different RM as
>> per our last conversation).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Khushboo
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 5:31 PM Khushboo Vashi <
>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rahul,
>>>
>>> I couldn't continue my review as I got an error on update.
>>>
>>> [image: Partitioned_sql_update.png]
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Khushboo
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 5:19 PM Rahul Shirsat <
>>> rahul(dot)shirsat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Khushboo,
>>>>
>>>> I had already corrected the patch as soon as I saw your mail, but
>>>> couldn't send you as I went out on an urgency. Now sending it.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:25 AM Khushboo Vashi <
>>>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Rahul,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am getting errors while applying the patch, please rebase the patch
>>>>> and send it again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Khushboo
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:25 PM Akshay Joshi <
>>>>> akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Khushboo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you please review it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:12 PM Rahul Shirsat <
>>>>>> rahul(dot)shirsat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Hackers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Following patch includes fix for :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Storage parameters should be displayed in parent tables's SQL.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As the code will be upgraded in feature #5649
>>>>>>> <https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/5649>, so only initial test
>>>>>>> cases for pg 10, 11 are included in this patch, so later it can be
>>>>>>> continued with the latest code.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> *Rahul Shirsat*
>>>>>>> Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB Corporation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 2:27 PM Khushboo Vashi <
>>>>>>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Rahul,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - The storage parameters should be displayed in the parent table's
>>>>>>>> SQL too
>>>>>>>> - Please write test cases, preferably re-sql test cases
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Khushboo
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:28 AM Akshay Joshi <
>>>>>>>> akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Khushboo,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you please review it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 1:45 AM Rahul Shirsat <
>>>>>>>>> rahul(dot)shirsat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Hackers,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please find the attached patch which fixes the issue related to
>>>>>>>>>> the partition table with storage parameters.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> *Rahul Shirsat*
>>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB Corporation.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> *Thanks & Regards*
>>>>>>>>> *Akshay Joshi*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Sr. Software Architect*
>>>>>>>>> *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited*
>>>>>>>>> *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> *Rahul Shirsat*
>>>>>>> Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB Corporation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Thanks & Regards*
>>>>>> *Akshay Joshi*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Sr. Software Architect*
>>>>>> *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited*
>>>>>> *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Rahul Shirsat*
>>>> Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB Corporation.
>>>>
>>>
>
> --
> *Thanks & Regards*
> *Akshay Joshi*
>
> *Sr. Software Architect*
> *EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited*
> *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*
>

--
*Thanks & Regards*
*Akshay Joshi*

*Sr. Software Architect*
*EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited*
*Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikhil Mohite 2020-07-13 04:10:23 Patch for SonarQube code scan fixes
Previous Message Akshay Joshi 2020-07-11 15:03:12 pgAdmin 4 commit: Reverted fix for #5569 due to a couple of issues.