Re: Minor revision downgrade (9.2.11 -> 9.2.10)

I hate to ask the obvious, but have you made sure you copied over the
postgresql.conf and pg_hba.conf to make it identical?

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 04:40:15PM +1200, Fabio Ugo Venchiarutti wrote:
> > We're fairly confident that it's an issue with the hardware but we
> > have political reasons to downgrade PG to 9.2.10 to show the hosting
> > supplier that it's their fault.
> >
> >
> > The release notes for 9.2.11 mention no data structure changes (in
> > line with the usual PG versioning policy). Is it just as safe to
> > downgrade too? We tested it on a couple non-critical boxes to no ill
> > effect whatsoever, but we'd like a second opinion before we do it on
> > the live installation too.
>
> I have rarely seen this question asked. I think minor-release
> downgrading is fine in this case.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
>
> + Everyone has their own god. +
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

--
*Melvin Davidson*
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.