Re: Minor revision downgrade (9.2.11 -> 9.2.10)

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Fabio Ugo Venchiarutti <fabio(at)vuole(dot)me>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Russel Clarke <russell(dot)c(at)geoop(dot)com>, Brendan Cervin <brendan(dot)c(at)geoop(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Minor revision downgrade (9.2.11 -> 9.2.10)
Date: 2015-06-02 11:39:43
Message-ID: 20150602113943.GA26887@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 04:40:15PM +1200, Fabio Ugo Venchiarutti wrote:
> We're fairly confident that it's an issue with the hardware but we
> have political reasons to downgrade PG to 9.2.10 to show the hosting
> supplier that it's their fault.
>
>
> The release notes for 9.2.11 mention no data structure changes (in
> line with the usual PG versioning policy). Is it just as safe to
> downgrade too? We tested it on a couple non-critical boxes to no ill
> effect whatsoever, but we'd like a second opinion before we do it on
> the live installation too.

I have rarely seen this question asked. I think minor-release
downgrading is fine in this case.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2015-06-02 11:47:35 Re: odbc to emulate mysql for end programs
Previous Message Thomas Kellerer 2015-06-02 11:31:55 Re: odbc to emulate mysql for end programs