| From: | Nikhil Sontakke <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints |
| Date: | 2012-01-17 06:38:54 |
| Message-ID: | CANgU5ZdMGbN4y2uzV0iZk-x+brAyVs_Eggp6kyf0gtcCUXbrLg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > I will really try to see if we have other issues. Really cannot have
> Robert
> > reporting all the bugs and getting annoyed, but there are lotsa
> variations
> > possible with inheritance..
>
> BTW thank you for doing the work on this. Probably the reason no one
> bothers too much with inheritance is that even something that's
> seemingly simple such as what you tried to do here has all these little
> details that's hard to get right.
>
>
Thanks Alvaro. Yeah, inheritance is "semantics" quicksand :)
Appreciate all the help from you, Robert and Alex Hunsaker on this.
Regards,
Nikhils
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2012-01-17 06:52:30 | Re: WAL Restore process during recovery |
| Previous Message | Nikhil Sontakke | 2012-01-17 06:36:28 | Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints |