From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WAL Restore process during recovery |
Date: | 2012-01-17 06:52:30 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwE_KHsgM_1reHHJo36WhmJqCa9LJarC45yQacuXEzwcJA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> WALRestore process asynchronously executes restore_command while
> recovery continues working.
>
> Overlaps downloading of next WAL file to reduce time delays in file
> based archive recovery.
>
> Handles cases of file-only and streaming/file correctly.
Though I've not reviewed the patch deeply yet, I observed the following
two problems when I tested the patch.
When I set up streaming replication + archive (i.e., restore_command is set)
and started the standby, I got the following error:
FATAL: all AuxiliaryProcs are in use
LOG: walrestore process (PID 18839) exited with exit code 1
When I started an archive recovery without setting restore_command,
it successfully finished.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2012-01-17 07:46:07 | Re: psql case preserving completion |
Previous Message | Nikhil Sontakke | 2012-01-17 06:38:54 | Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints |