Re: relfrozenxid not getting reset even after manual VACUUM

From: Armand du Plessis <adp(at)bank(dot)io>
To: "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: relfrozenxid not getting reset even after manual VACUUM
Date: 2013-08-05 18:46:55
Message-ID: CANf99sVYYT8YWWZzwYDfZ5AtnUC7zzFRgVGwEYtOrCRzjwrQVg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

After a second manual run it properly reset the relfrozenid on the affected
relation.

Only difference this one was a vacuum analyze but I suspect that was not
the cause.

On Monday, August 5, 2013, Armand du Plessis wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> We're running into a scenario where despite doing a manual vacuum as a
> superuser the relfrozenxid for one relation now dangerously close to
> wraparound is not getting reset.
>
> It's a Postgres 9.2.3 cluster. We shutdown other access to the machine
> while running the VACUUM to ensure it could complete quick enough with an
> aggressive vacuum (vacuum_cost_limit 10000 and no delay). The previous
> autovacuum was running for days without completing.
>
> There's also no old transactions in either pg_prepared_xacts or
> pg_stat_activity.
>
> production=# SELECT relname, age(relfrozenxid) as xid_age FROM pg_class
> WHERE relkind = 'r' ORDER BY age(relfrozenxid) DESC LIMIT 10;
> relname | xid_age
> -------------------+------------
> messages | 2050996318
>
> (This is a similar scenario to one I've posted about a while back (
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3238.1369055503@sss.pgh.pa.us) - In
> that case I advanced the autovacuum_freeze_max_age with the intention to
> replace the problematic table. That hasn't happened in time and now sitting
> with a real problem)
>
> Below is the vacuum settings at the time of the manual vacuum:
>
> name | setting
> ---------------------------------+------------
> autovacuum | on
> autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor | 0.01
> autovacuum_analyze_threshold | 50
> autovacuum_freeze_max_age | 1750000000
> autovacuum_max_workers | 2
> autovacuum_naptime | 60
> autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay | 50
> autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit | 200
> autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor | 2
> autovacuum_vacuum_threshold | 50
> log_autovacuum_min_duration | 0
> vacuum_cost_delay | 0
> vacuum_cost_limit | 10000
> vacuum_cost_page_dirty | 20
> vacuum_cost_page_hit | 1
> vacuum_cost_page_miss | 10
> vacuum_defer_cleanup_age | 0
> vacuum_freeze_min_age | 25000000
> vacuum_freeze_table_age | 150000000
>
> The tail-end of the vacuum log:
>
> INFO: index "message_sender_client_ref_confirmation_index" now contains
> 529204260 row versions in 10752961 pages
> DETAIL: 261675128 index row versions were removed.
> 722622 index pages have been deleted, 367793 are currently reusable.
> CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.24 sec.
> INFO: index "messages_v2_recipient_sender" now contains 529194622 row
> versions in 2632966 pages
> DETAIL: 109563299 index row versions were removed.
> 216413 index pages have been deleted, 132791 are currently reusable.
> CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.01 sec.
> INFO: index "messages_v6_recipient_created_at_type" now contains 91840693
> row versions in 2312775 pages
> DETAIL: 177088781 index row versions were removed.
> 209178 index pages have been deleted, 3045 are currently reusable.
> CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.03 sec.
> INFO: index "messages_v6_sender_created_at_type" now contains 91840716
> row versions in 2272370 pages
> DETAIL: 175741424 index row versions were removed.
> 201936 index pages have been deleted, 2958 are currently reusable.
> CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.04 sec.
> INFO: index "messages_v6_unread_messages_count" now contains 4797806 row
> versions in 29930 pages
> DETAIL: 1808779 index row versions were removed.
> 77 index pages have been deleted, 5 are currently reusable.
> CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec.
> INFO: "messages": found 51093697 removable, 529671512 nonremovable row
> versions in 22666431 out of 22666435 pages
> DETAIL: 701995 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
> There were 716893565 unused item pointers.
> 0 pages are entirely empty.
> CPU 1229.92s/4618.87u sec elapsed 13951.33 sec.
> INFO: vacuuming "pg_toast.pg_toast_18369"
> INFO: index "pg_toast_18369_index" now contains 0 row versions in 1 pages
> DETAIL: 0 index row versions were removed.
> 0 index pages have been deleted, 0 are currently reusable.
> CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec.
> INFO: "pg_toast_18369": found 0 removable, 0 nonremovable row versions in
> 0 out of 0 pages
> DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
> There were 0 unused item pointers.
> 0 pages are entirely empty.
> CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec.
> VACUUM
>
> If I look at the pg_stat_user_tables log I can see it's cleaned up the
> dead tuples successfully:
>
> production=# select relname, n_live_tup, n_dead_tup, last_vacuum,
> last_autovacuum from pg_stat_user_tables;
> relname | n_live_tup | n_dead_tup |
> last_vacuum | last_autovacuum
>
> -------------------------------+------------+------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------
> messages | 529790266 | 2046126 | 2013-08-05
> 13:56:07.794664+00 |
>
>
> I've got a ton of entries like the below in the log since we're
> approaching the end of the world:
>
> 013-08-05 15:15:07.588 UTC,,,30352,,51ffc17b.7690,2,,2013-08-05 15:15:07
> UTC,9/358152441,3787657047,DEBUG,00000,"transaction ID wrap limit is
> 3884757767, limited by database with OID 17671",,,,,,,,,""
>
> Doing a VACUUM on any other relation resets the XID correctly.
>
> Any suggestions on how we can resolve this before we get shutdown? I
> suspect even in shutdown mode we'll have this issue unless we can track
> down the cause.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Armand
>

--
Sent from Gmail Mobile

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brian Wong 2013-08-05 22:51:34 After upgrading from 9.1.1 to 9.1.9, pgadmin's server status window gives error
Previous Message Jorge Torralba 2013-08-05 17:29:43 Simple question on fail over and config files