| From: | "Wayne E(dot) Seguin" <wayneeseguin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Doiron, Daniel" <DoironD(at)advisory(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: replicating many to one |
| Date: | 2015-06-04 18:36:15 |
| Message-ID: | CANf8RLvhHGHx_dyS7qffN8ets9QROk7E-JdFUYmBb2_UGE4WXQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Take a good look at http://2ndquadrant.com/en/resources/bdr/
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Doiron, Daniel <DoironD(at)advisory(dot)com> wrote:
> I have a situation where I need to replicate the databases in 4 clusters
> on 4 individual servers to a single cluster on 1 server. So far, the best
> option looks like pgpool statement-based replication, the major down side
> being sequences. Does anyone know a better way to achieve this type of
> replication?
>
--
~Wayne
Wayne E. Seguin
wayneeseguin(at)gmail(dot)com
wayneeseguin on irc.freenode.net
http://twitter.com/wayneeseguin/
https://github.com/wayneeseguin/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John R Pierce | 2015-06-04 18:45:39 | Re: replicating many to one |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-06-04 18:22:22 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |