| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Steve Kehlet <steve(dot)kehlet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| Date: | 2015-06-04 18:22:22 |
| Message-ID: | 20150604182222.GK133018@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>
> > So here's a patch taking a different approach.
>
> I tried to apply this to 9.3 but it's messy because of pgindent. Anyone
> would have a problem with me backpatching a pgindent run of multixact.c?
Done.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Wayne E. Seguin | 2015-06-04 18:36:15 | Re: replicating many to one |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-06-04 17:31:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2015-06-04 18:33:47 | Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-06-04 18:01:22 | Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely |