From: | Rene Romero Benavides <rene(dot)romero(dot)b(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Raphael Bauduin <rblists(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: testing database consistency |
Date: | 2013-10-24 13:06:33 |
Message-ID: | CANaGW08wAh5C90rEJEFLMbyT-Cd5g7oQ6fuTTzEMDbKwMefgDA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
PostgreSQL 9.3 ships with data corruption detection facilities
http://michael.otacoo.com/postgresql-2/postgres-9-3-feature-highlight-data-checksums/but
it works on a transactional basis.
2013/10/24 Raphael Bauduin <rblists(at)gmail(dot)com>
> Hi,
>
> I have a postgresql running in a virtual machine (linux, kvm).
> I wanted to test that the backup, which takes a copy of the disk image, is
> valid and usable.
>
> I have taken a copy of the disk image and run it fine on another computer.
> However, just starting the server succesfully does not mean there is no
> corrupted data in the database. This is why I'm looking to a way to
> validate that all the data stored in the postgresql is ok, ie consistent
> and usable. Does anyone have advices on how to best check the validity of
> the whole database?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Raphaël
>
--
El genio es 1% inspiración y 99% transpiración.
Thomas Alva Edison
http://pglearn.blogspot.mx/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas SIMON | 2013-10-24 14:21:00 | Huge increase of database partition |
Previous Message | Raphael Bauduin | 2013-10-24 07:18:59 | testing database consistency |