From: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Shankaran, Akash" <akash(dot)shankaran(at)intel(dot)com> |
Cc: | "R, Rakshit" <rakshit(dot)r(at)intel(dot)com>, "Devulapalli, Raghuveer" <raghuveer(dot)devulapalli(at)intel(dot)com>, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Giacchino, Luca" <luca(dot)giacchino(at)intel(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Paul, Sourav Kumar" <sourav(dot)kumar(dot)paul(at)intel(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: SIMD optimization for list_sort |
Date: | 2025-03-03 10:48:18 |
Message-ID: | CANWCAZbpue5qXbUJn-nL5aoqntR6VcrcBvTjzA2SxTagbrYy7g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 1:23 PM Shankaran, Akash
<akash(dot)shankaran(at)intel(dot)com> wrote:
> Given the same x86-simdsort library is intended to optimize 1) list_sort 2) tuple sort, it didn't make sense to duplicate the work to integrate it in pg_vector for list_sort, and then again in postgres for tuple-sort.
Thank you for the context -- the motivation is clear now.
I imagine this kind of integration work is messy and difficult, which
is why I would be reluctant to write something that way if I have a
choice.
> We're trying to tackle list_sort and tuple_sort in separate patches using the same x86-simdsort library,
with the goal to optimize both. Let us know if this approach is
preferred and if the list_sort patch could be reviewed and any other
tests we should do, or would you rather see tuple_sort benchmarks.
The approach I actually prefer to is to hear about the high-level
architecture first, before being asked to look at code. Tuple sort has
special challenges, so when you're ready to start a new thread for
that, I'll be curious about your findings.
--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Naylor | 2025-03-03 10:58:43 | Re: vacuumdb changes for stats import/export |
Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2025-03-03 10:47:28 | Re: per backend WAL statistics |