Re: Doc limitation update proposal: include out-of-line OID usage per TOAST-ed columns

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Doc limitation update proposal: include out-of-line OID usage per TOAST-ed columns
Date: 2024-08-20 07:03:13
Message-ID: CANWCAZZsu5FwH6__gCQOfJcLB9LdOGZ_pNk0HJ2HGspQXqeUbQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 11:01 AM John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Extra explicitness might be good. "Response time" seems like a
> networking concept, so possibly ", in turn slowing down INSERT/UPDATE
> statements." I'm inclined to commit that way in a couple days, barring
> further comments.

This is done.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kirill Reshke 2024-08-20 07:06:24 Re: Incremental View Maintenance, take 2
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2024-08-20 06:59:12 Re: Remaining reference to _PG_fini() in ldap_password_func