Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)
Date: 2018-01-10 16:27:53
Message-ID: CANP8+jLpv1h+OFPjDYVzMXeyLauyu2f4_bU4EApkst8tWFnkYg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10 January 2018 at 16:08, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I think that we really need to think about allowing clients to tell
> the server which GUCs they'd like reported, instead of having a single
> list to which everyone is bound.

+1

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-10 16:59:40 Re: portal pinning
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-01-10 16:24:31 Re: Multi-level hierarchy with parallel append can lead to an extra subplan.