Re: Multi-level hierarchy with parallel append can lead to an extra subplan.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Multi-level hierarchy with parallel append can lead to an extra subplan.
Date: 2018-01-10 16:24:31
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYsH4-+5reuDu7jfpUe2bZbk9oM3btK0a_+En6Rd9DFcA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 5:41 AM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> This subplan should not be there. It looks like that's because when
> we add up subpaths while preparing Parallel Append path containing mix of
> partial and non-partial child paths, in accumulate_append_subpath(),
> the subpath being added is an Append path because it's a multi-level
> partition. So in the condition "else if (special_subpaths != NULL)",
> both *subpaths and *special_paths get updated. But then it is not
> returning from there when it should. Instead, the control passes to
> the end of function where *subpaths is again populated :
> *subpaths = lappend(*subpaths, path);
> which leads to an extra child with partial subpath getting added.

Boy, what a dumb mistake on my part. Thanks for finding the bug,
Rajkumar. Thanks for analyzing it, Amit. I have committed the fix.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2018-01-10 16:27:53 Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2018-01-10 16:15:44 Re: Rangejoin rebased