From: | P Gouv <kadmos(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Moshe Jacobson <moshe(at)neadwerx(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Counting all results before LIMIT |
Date: | 2012-10-05 15:02:55 |
Message-ID: | CANMkqmS1wKRCv3kFoeOuHqx6ZqMNzgGzGrowOGZXoKpJBL0SgQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
You cant. There is an article about count performance. Generally its slow
but latest version 9.2 i think supports index for count under some
condition.But 300 isnt that much that you should worry.Another modern
solution is to not count results just add one more at limit to see if there
is next page.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Moshe Jacobson <moshe(at)neadwerx(dot)com> wrote:
> We have a PHP web application that pulls results from the database and
> paginates them.
> We show e.g. "1-50 of 300" so the user knows how many total results there
> are, and which ones are currently being displayed.
> To achieve this, we use a query with LIMIT...OFFSET to get the displayed
> results, and we do another identical query using count(*) to get the total
> count.
> Is there a more efficient way to do this that does not require us to do
> two queries? I just feel that it's a waste of resources the way we do it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Moshe Jacobson
> Nead Werx, Inc. | Senior Systems Engineer
> 2323 Cumberland Parkway, Suite 201 | Atlanta, GA 30339
> moshe(at)neadwerx(dot)com | www.neadwerx.com
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ivan Voras | 2012-10-05 15:13:33 | Re: Re: What's faster? BEGIN ... EXCEPTION or CREATE TEMP TABLE IF NOT EXISTS? |
Previous Message | P Gouv | 2012-10-05 14:52:00 | Add a stemmer for fts |