Re: OpenSSL v1.1.1n in postgres

From: Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "Vibhu Chauhan (iDEAS-ER&D)" <vibhu(dot)chauhan(at)wipro(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL v1.1.1n in postgres
Date: 2022-03-27 02:11:32
Message-ID: CANFyU940FxTkdiL62OwcNnYWDMmtY3rjeJ8AHnFT3YSi9fxJbQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Hi,

Please note the EDB windows installer updates carrying the OpenSSL 1.1.1n
are already available for download through website and stackbuilder. The
latest PG installer versions for all the branches are:

- 14.2-2
- 13.6-2
- 12.10-2
- 11.15-2
- 10.20-2

Please update to the required version.

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 2:47 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> "David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I do find it sad that this question about when a CVE has been patched is
> > being asked where the active version is 10 months old and missing 3
> > PostgreSQL CVE fixes, including an SSL related one in 13.5
>
> In the OP's defense, this OpenSSL CVE does look a lot scarier than
> any of ours ... if I'm reading it right, anyone who can reach your
> postmaster port can arrange to chew 100% CPU on your server.
> OTOH, they can't do anything more than that, and you probably
> shouldn't have your DB server accessible from the open internet
> anyway.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>

--
Sandeep Thakkar

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Semab Tariq 2022-03-28 07:20:37 Re: BUG #17447: uninstaller fails
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-03-26 21:17:20 Re: OpenSSL v1.1.1n in postgres