Re: per backend WAL statistics

From: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: per backend WAL statistics
Date: 2025-02-17 07:08:43
Message-ID: CAN55FZ3t16nnBDjeuLc45OvN=npnSVSOcp_ZnGXxO1-ijQKvnA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Thank you for working on this!

On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 at 09:59, Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> There is still something that would simplify what is done here: it's the
> "the elimination of the write & sync columns for pg_stat_wal" mentioned in [2].
>
> I'll add it in the new patch serie for this thread (that simplifies the new
> pg_stat_wal_build_tuple() among other things) unless Nazir beat me to it.
>
> [2]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Z6L3ZNGCljZZouvN%40paquier.xyz

I am working on some other stuff right now. Please feel free to work on it.

--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2025-02-17 07:15:33 Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2025-02-17 06:59:40 Re: per backend WAL statistics