From: | Stepan Neretin <sncfmgg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: gamma() and lgamma() functions |
Date: | 2024-07-01 14:31:59 |
Message-ID: | CAN-sa+BiLPkG4HSMdUFA6xYgHf3zxnA56bC87bQw_iyehtoyDg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 5:33 PM Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Attached is a patch adding support for the gamma and log-gamma
> functions. See, for example:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function
>
> I think these are very useful general-purpose mathematical functions.
> They're part of C99, and they're commonly included in other
> mathematical libraries, such as the python math module, so I think
> it's useful to make them available from SQL.
>
> The error-handling for these functions seems to be a little trickier
> than most, so that might need further discussion.
>
> Regards,
> Dean
>
I tried to review the patch without applying it. It looks good to me, but I
have one notice:
ERROR: value out of range: overflow. I think we need to add information
about the available ranges in the error message
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2024-07-01 14:35:02 | Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-07-01 14:26:22 | Re: Should we document how column DEFAULT expressions work? |