Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry

From: Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrei Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
Date: 2023-12-18 09:05:28
Message-ID: CAN-LCVMEM54iSLFANEne7eDjGCAipmn+1dDp67Jju7q2sxfHmw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

This patch looks like a good solution for a pain in the ass, I'm too for
this patch to be committed.
Have looked through the code and agree with Andrei, the code looks good.
Just a suggestion - maybe it is worth adding a function for detaching the
segment,
for cases when we unload and/or re-load the extension?

--
Regards,
Nikita Malakhov
Postgres Professional
The Russian Postgres Company
https://postgrespro.ru/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-12-18 09:10:51 Re: trying again to get incremental backup
Previous Message Andrei Lepikhov 2023-12-18 08:32:08 Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry