From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, "Prabakaran, Vaishnavi" <VaishnaviP(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Manuel Kniep <m(dot)kniep(at)web(dot)de>, "fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp" <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq |
Date: | 2017-06-22 01:03:05 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YHK59uhwyEs1cy_BGw9Ntak1OFacjDcKiSMnsLd0ekUeA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 22 June 2017 at 08:29, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I.e. we're doing tiny write send() syscalls (they should be coalesced)
That's likely worth doing, but can probably wait for a separate patch.
The kernel will usually do some packet aggregation unless we use
TCP_NODELAY (which we don't and shouldn't), and the syscall overhead
is IMO not worth worrying about just yet.
> and then completely unnecessarily call recv() over and over again
> without polling. To me it looks very much like we're just doing either
> exactly once per command...
Yeah, that looks suspect.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-06-22 01:07:21 | Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-06-22 01:01:46 | Re: Pluggable storage |