Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

From: "Daniel Verite" <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
To: "Craig Ringer" <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>,"Vaishnavi Prabakaran" <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>,"Michael Paquier" <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>,"David Steele" <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>,"Prabakaran, Vaishnavi" <VaishnaviP(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>,"Haribabu Kommi" <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>,"Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>,"Dmitry Igrishin" <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>,"PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Manuel Kniep" <m(dot)kniep(at)web(dot)de>,"fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp" <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>,"Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date: 2017-06-22 11:23:11
Message-ID: 66ab30f4-0f0f-41ff-925b-5bbbafcad678@manitou-mail.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Craig Ringer wrote:

> The kernel will usually do some packet aggregation unless we use
> TCP_NODELAY (which we don't and shouldn't)

Not sure. As a point of comparison, Oracle has it as a tunable
parameter (TCP.NODELAY), and they changed its default from
No to Yes starting from their 10g R2.

Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org
Twitter: @DanielVerite

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2017-06-22 11:38:01 Re: Regarding Postgres Dynamic Shared Memory (DSA)
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2017-06-22 11:09:38 TRUE and true