From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: The pg_indent on on ftp is outdated |
Date: | 2017-12-22 00:33:37 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YF7Ae+Ky8wYh8kovK+8w=qdmZZpG0rD6NXOBKZ9JFGR9g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On 21 Dec. 2017 22:42, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>> The pg_indent on www is outdated, and doesn't understand --version .
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/ftp/dev/
> Is there a reason to keep it at all if its obsolete, or should we just
> delete it?
The only reason I can think of why someone might still want that version
is if they're doing hacking on a pre-v10 branch and would like to indent
accordingly. If we have someplace for historical versions, I'd suggest
moving this tarball to there, and replacing it with a README that says
"go here for pre-v10 pgindent, or there for modern versions".
Add it as a branch in the git repo and backpatch the pgindent README?
Hardly seems worth the hassle. It's not like back patches need tons of
worry about pgindent etc anyway.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2017-12-22 00:51:58 | Re: force parallel mode vs CTAS |
Previous Message | Gene Selkov | 2017-12-22 00:27:18 | Re: genomic locus |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ivan E. Panchenko | 2017-12-22 10:16:43 | Re: Postgres Pro build for windows |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-12-21 14:42:45 | Re: The pg_indent on on ftp is outdated |