Re: The pg_indent on on ftp is outdated

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The pg_indent on on ftp is outdated
Date: 2017-12-22 00:33:37
Message-ID: CAMsr+YF7Ae+Ky8wYh8kovK+8w=qdmZZpG0rD6NXOBKZ9JFGR9g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On 21 Dec. 2017 22:42, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>> The pg_indent on www is outdated, and doesn't understand --version .
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/ftp/dev/

> Is there a reason to keep it at all if its obsolete, or should we just
> delete it?

The only reason I can think of why someone might still want that version
is if they're doing hacking on a pre-v10 branch and would like to indent
accordingly. If we have someplace for historical versions, I'd suggest
moving this tarball to there, and replacing it with a README that says
"go here for pre-v10 pgindent, or there for modern versions".

Add it as a branch in the git repo and backpatch the pgindent README?

Hardly seems worth the hassle. It's not like back patches need tons of
worry about pgindent etc anyway.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haribabu Kommi 2017-12-22 00:51:58 Re: force parallel mode vs CTAS
Previous Message Gene Selkov 2017-12-22 00:27:18 Re: genomic locus

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ivan E. Panchenko 2017-12-22 10:16:43 Re: Postgres Pro build for windows
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-12-21 14:42:45 Re: The pg_indent on on ftp is outdated