From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Timing-sensitive case in src/test/recovery TAP tests |
Date: | 2017-06-26 03:12:10 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YEbb5rxgZRfCdUbUJwF7rEmbmSVKTbyqYBj48rOARhO=w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26 June 2017 at 11:06, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> As long as we are on it, there is this code block in the test:
> my ($xmin, $catalog_xmin) = get_slot_xmins($node_master, $slotname_1);
> is($xmin, '', 'non-cascaded slot xmin null with no hs_feedback');
> is($catalog_xmin, '', 'non-cascaded slot xmin null with no hs_feedback');
>
> ($xmin, $catalog_xmin) = get_slot_xmins($node_standby_1, $slotname_2);
> is($xmin, '', 'cascaded slot xmin null with no hs_feedback');
> is($catalog_xmin, '', 'cascaded slot xmin null with no hs_feedback');
>
> This should be more verbose as the 2nd and 4th test should say
> "catalog xmin" instead of xmin.
Agree, should. Mind posting a revision?
> Also, wouldn't it be better to poll as well node_standby_1's
> pg_replication_slot on slotname_2? It would really seem better to make
> the nullness check conditional in get_slot_xmins instead. Sorry for
> changing opinion here.
I'm not sure I understand this.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-06-26 03:25:50 | Re: Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-06-26 03:12:09 | Re: Get stuck when dropping a subscription during synchronizing table |