From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rui Hai Jiang <ruihaij(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: how is the WAL receiver process stopped and restarted when the network connection is broken and then restored? |
Date: | 2016-06-22 22:43:58 |
Message-ID: | CAMsr+YE1Oc7axX=KqSUGn=wQp4gs=VLxO4WFk1YJP4E2X8yomA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 22 June 2016 at 23:52, Rui Hai Jiang <ruihaij(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have one Primary server and one Standby server. They are doing streaming
> replication well.
>
> I did some testing. I broke the network connection between them for a few
> minutes, and then restored the network. I found the both the WAL sender and
> WAL receiver were stopped and the restarted.
>
> I wonder how WAL receiver process is stopped and restarted. I have checked
> the code hoping to find out the answer, but I don't have any clue.
>
If TCP keepalives are enabled, the TCP connection will break when the
keepalives stop arriving.
If wal receiver timeout is enabled, it'll notice that it didn't get any
data from the walsender and assume it went away.
If the OS notices that the socket went away - say, it got a TCP RST from
the remote peer as it shut down cleanly - it'll close the walreceiver
socket and the walreceiver will quit.
Otherwise it won't notice and will wait indefinitely.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-22 23:22:16 | Re: Parallelized polymorphic aggs, and aggtype vs aggoutputtype |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2016-06-22 21:51:09 | Re: Parallelized polymorphic aggs, and aggtype vs aggoutputtype |