From: | Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Remove source code display from \df+? |
Date: | 2023-01-22 19:53:48 |
Message-ID: | CAMsGm5f6Cyq3sbjyb2hi1MNjadR=Q-XYr-k_06OmE0vYCF-C8g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 at 14:26, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
wrote:
> On 2023-Jan-22, Isaac Morland wrote:
>
> > I’ve re-written the tests to create a test-specific role and functions so
> > there is no longer a dependency on the superuser name.
>
> This one would fail the sanity check that all roles created by
> regression tests need to have names that start with "regress_".
>
Thanks for the correction. Now I feel like I've skipped some of the
readings!
Updated patch attached. Informally, I am adopting the regress_* policy for
all object types.
> I pondered the notion of going with the flow and just leaving out the
> > tests but that seemed like giving up too easily.
>
> I think avoiding even more untested code is good, so +1 for keeping at
> it.
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Remove-source-code-display-from-df-v5.patch | application/octet-stream | 6.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-22 19:59:34 | Deadlock between logrep apply worker and tablesync worker |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-22 19:20:02 | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |