Re: Remove source code display from \df+?

Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 at 14:26, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
> wrote:
>> This one would fail the sanity check that all roles created by
>> regression tests need to have names that start with "regress_".

> Thanks for the correction. Now I feel like I've skipped some of the
> readings!
> Updated patch attached. Informally, I am adopting the regress_* policy for
> all object types.

That's excessive. The policy Alvaro mentions applies to globally-visible
object names (i.e., database, role, and tablespace names), and it's there
to try to ensure that doing "make installcheck" against a live
installation won't clobber any non-test-created objects. There's no point
in having such a policy within a test database --- its most likely effect
there would be to increase the risk that different test scripts step on
each others' toes. If you feel a need for a name prefix for non-global
objects, use something based on the name of your test script.

regards, tom lane