From: | Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Reducing the log spam |
Date: | 2024-03-06 22:33:33 |
Message-ID: | CAMsGm5eUBnrV6QR+-8ErTBXGw7qXEWAuJY+DwYZTSb5CGiXcwA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 07:55, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> Inspired by feedback to [1], I thought about how to reduce log spam.
>
> My experience from the field is that a lot of log spam looks like
>
> database/table/... "xy" does not exist
> duplicate key value violates unique constraint "xy"
>
> So what about a parameter "log_suppress_sqlstates" that suppresses
> logging ERROR and FATAL messages with the enumerated SQL states?
>
> My idea for a default setting would be something like
>
> log_suppress_sqlstates = '23505,3D000,3F000,42601,42704,42883,42P01'
>
> but that's of course bikeshedding territory.
>
I like the basic idea and the way of specifying states seems likely to
cover a lot of typical use cases. Of course in principle the application
should be fixed, but in practice we can't always control that.
I have two questions about this:
First, can it be done per role? If I have a particular application which is
constantly throwing some particular error, I might want to suppress it, but
not suppress the same error occasionally coming from another application. I
see ALTER DATABASE name SET configuration_parameter … as being useful here,
but often multiple applications share a database.
Second, where can this setting be adjusted? Can any session turn off
logging of arbitrary sets of sqlstates resulting from its queries? It feels
to me like that might allow security problems to be hidden. Specifically,
the first thing an SQL injection might do would be to turn off logging of
important error states, then proceed to try various nefarious things.
It seems to me the above questions interact; an answer to the first might
be "ALTER ROLE role_specification SET configuration_parameter", but I think
that would allow roles to change their own settings, contrary to the
concern raised by the second question.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-03-06 22:45:01 | Re: Hooking into ExplainOneQuery() complicated by missing standard_ExplainOneQuery |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-03-06 22:22:51 | Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases |