Re: How can this abstract method error happen?

From: Pawel Veselov <pawel(dot)veselov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How can this abstract method error happen?
Date: 2014-01-14 01:05:48
Message-ID: CAMnJ+Bdgg=jNu7YvEPVjJJzGMaRmqwPWhKR_gt86MAoR2suAEQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:

> Is there anything else in the exception chain ?
>

Nope, but I don't see how there would be.

>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Pawel Veselov <pawel(dot)veselov(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I'm getting an abstract method error problem with Postgres JDBC (top of
>> exception trace:http://pastebin.com/xsDKSdiE). There isn't a stable way
>> to reproduce this that I found. The driver is 9.1-902.
>>
>> I don't quite understand how this can even happen. Looks like all the all
>> statement object are created by the connection object, and all connection
>> objects are created by the Driver. Driver always creates connection version
>> 4, and that connection always creates statements version 4, so it should
>> always implement isClosed(). I never ever used any earlier drivers (so I
>> don't think there is C/P mess up, but I grepped my class path too).
>>
>> Can anything else ever create a connection object, which can be of
>> earlier version?
>>
>>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2014-01-14 11:26:33 Re: How can this abstract method error happen?
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2014-01-14 00:29:28 Re: How can this abstract method error happen?