From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pawel Veselov <pawel(dot)veselov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How can this abstract method error happen? |
Date: | 2014-01-14 00:29:28 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HHJM90fagxJuhN3qssSyEOW+ETPLSDVHLr+K_mn+_Ax_Pg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Is there anything else in the exception chain ?
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Pawel Veselov <pawel(dot)veselov(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm getting an abstract method error problem with Postgres JDBC (top of
> exception trace:http://pastebin.com/xsDKSdiE) There isn't a stable way
> to reproduce this that I found. The driver is 9.1-902.
>
> I don't quite understand how this can even happen. Looks like all the all
> statement object are created by the connection object, and all connection
> objects are created by the Driver. Driver always creates connection version
> 4, and that connection always creates statements version 4, so it should
> always implement isClosed(). I never ever used any earlier drivers (so I
> don't think there is C/P mess up, but I grepped my class path too).
>
> Can anything else ever create a connection object, which can be of earlier
> version?
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pawel Veselov | 2014-01-14 01:05:48 | Re: How can this abstract method error happen? |
Previous Message | Pawel Veselov | 2014-01-13 23:26:46 | How can this abstract method error happen? |