Re: [PROPOSAL] Inputs on forcing VACUUM VERBOSE to write timestamp

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Inputs on forcing VACUUM VERBOSE to write timestamp
Date: 2015-09-03 18:50:46
Message-ID: CAMkU=1zSRCDAijSXWAq6AfnaOcUEW1cV-sdu5=FDm+NrjoNUhg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 2015-09-03 21:45:52 +0530, dinesh kumar wrote:
> > Forcing VACUUM VERBOSE to write timestamp, for each "INFO" entry. This
> was
> > raised already in this
> > <
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20031110162349.65542.qmail@web21408.mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > thread, and wanted to discuss it again. I didn't see any replies on this
> > old thread.
>
> Unconvinced - sounds like you're just re-inventing log_line_prefix.
>

Many times I've wanted a client_log_line_prefix. If someone wants to
invent that, I'd second it.

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-09-03 18:52:16 Re: Is this a bug?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-09-03 18:44:48 Re: Is this a bug?