| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Subject: | Re: Is this a bug? |
| Date: | 2015-09-03 18:44:48 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoavt0Ts3W3+hXafghn6wAuqSyqdLk8SG-Nq+ELQSpV2=g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
>
>> Why this patch was reverted one day after applied [1]? I didn't see any
>> discussion around it.
>
> Contributors whose patches are getting committed should really subscribe
> to pgsql-committers.
I would have thought discussion of committed patches should be moved
to -hackers. The description for the -committers list says:
"Notification of git commits are sent to this list. Do not post here!"
So, it's understandable that people would not expect other traffic there.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2015-09-03 18:50:46 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Inputs on forcing VACUUM VERBOSE to write timestamp |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2015-09-03 18:37:33 | Re: September 2015 Commitfest |