From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption |
Date: | 2017-11-03 16:12:31 |
Message-ID: | CAMkU=1yx5q1=iGHcTJKQsT=C+W4=pDH0o3sNZB_KfLB03YchfA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 10:22 PM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:
> On 11/2/2017 10:12 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/List_of_drivers
>>
>> What is 'python native'? psycopg works as long you update your libpq.
>>
>
>
> I thought pythonistas preferred using a native driver that didn't use
> libpq ?
I'm not a pythonista more of a python-when-I-must, but psycopg is the
dominant driver I've seen used and discussed. I had to use a different
driver (zxJDBC, for jython) and basically all advice I found was for
psycopg and not applicable to zxJDBC, which most people apparently had
never even heard of.
Anyway, I would think psycopg would be classed as a native binding, as it
uses libpq which is 'native' to PostgreSQL.
If someone has greater knowledge here, it would be nice to update the wiki
pages with new info.
Talk of what is native or not in pythons now has me thinking of the
Everglades.
Cheers,
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-11-03 18:24:05 | Re: Postgres 10 manual breaks links with anchors |
Previous Message | K. Brannen | 2017-11-03 14:35:37 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-11-03 16:28:25 | Re: Re: PANIC: invalid index offnum: 186 when processing BRIN indexes in VACUUM |
Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-11-03 16:04:10 | Re: Exclude pg_internal.init from base backup |