| From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_rewarm status |
| Date: | 2013-12-16 18:11:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAMkU=1yw4Yj5Yurh6_01aRkUSgUEvXn-TVmKf8qDj5bQPEoZQg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> Trying to follow the threads and other references - but I can't determine
> where this patch ended up.
> (
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmobRrRxCO+t6gcQrw_dJw+Uf9ZEdwf9beJnu+RB5TEBjEw@mail.gmail.com
> )
>
> I'm
> trying to experiment with some new hardware - and the functionality to
> add specific tables/indexes into cache ahead of time will benefit me
> greatly.
>
> I found a page describing how to apply the patch to 9.2.4 (jumping through
> some hoops - http://issues.collectionspace.org/browse/UCJEPS-432) and was
> hoping to get a version to apply to 9.3.X
>
> Can
> anyone advise me on how I might get this 'applied' to a 9.3.X source
> code base or any other options to denote specific relations that I'd
> like to get directly into shared_buffers?
>
In my experience the installation in 9.3.X the same way as it does in 9.2.4.
Cheers,
Jeff
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-12-16 18:34:10 | Re: pg_rewarm status |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-12-16 18:02:00 | Re: pg_rewarm status |