| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_rewarm status |
| Date: | 2013-12-16 18:02:00 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYj651SSe9vHs0r_X_8xVF8M0GDtsvkptSmsBNNhNJuHQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> Trying to follow the threads and other references - but I can't determine where this patch ended up.
> (http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmobRrRxCO+t6gcQrw_dJw+Uf9ZEdwf9beJnu+RB5TEBjEw@mail.gmail.com)
Well, the patch was rejected, more or less because people felt it
overlapped with pgfincore too much. I don't particularly agree,
because pgfincore can't load data into shared buffers and doesn't work
on Windows, but other people felt differently. There was talk of
polishing up pgfincore for possible inclusion in contrib, perhaps
adding this functionality along the way, but AFAIK there's been no
activity on that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-12-16 18:11:49 | Re: pg_rewarm status |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-12-16 17:48:06 | Re: logical changeset generation v6.8 |