| From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: distinct estimate of a hard-coded VALUES list |
| Date: | 2017-08-17 17:51:31 |
| Message-ID: | CAMkU=1yuEnrM7v+beQqkDUOmndemUO6+OnrACH7n1e4tNfFLug@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > This patch still applies, and I think the argument for it is still valid.
> > So I'm going to make a commit-fest entry for it. Is there additional
> > evidence we should gather?
>
> I think we had consensus to apply this at the start of the next
> development cycle; I just forgot to do it for v10. Hence, pushed
> into v11.
>
Thanks,
Jeff
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-17 18:06:59 | Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-17 17:50:47 | Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |