Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne(dot)adam(at)nokia(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Duquesne, Pierre (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <pierre(dot)duquesne(at)nokia(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Date: 2017-08-17 17:50:47
Message-ID: 28782.1502992247@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> This will be fixed by the patch [1] (execrescan_gathermerge_v2.patch)
>> I posted sometime back. The test case is slightly different, but may
>> I can re post the patch with your test case.

> I have kept the fix as it is but changed the test to match your test.

Pushed, with minor tidying of the test case. I think we can now
close this open item.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-08-17 18:06:59 Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-08-17 15:21:30 Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2017-08-17 17:51:31 Re: distinct estimate of a hard-coded VALUES list
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-08-17 16:56:23 assorted code cleanup